'Cronica de Una Muerte Anunciado\r'

' confederacy should non be darned for the antisocial behavior of some souls. Every association is make up of individuals with different values, preferences, goals and personalities. It is therefore not surprising to check into that some people know that society should be blamed for any antisocial behaviour the individual might display. Before considering both sides of this issue we volition define what is meant by the term antisocial behaviour. conduct that goes against what is considered acceptable by the norms opf society is said to be antisocial.Therefore, in most modern societies, mangle, drug-abuse, violence and ravishment are among the behaviours that are antisocial. Should the society really be held accountable for the misconduct of its citizens? Some feel that it is unsportsmanlike to blame the society because, as a easy moral agent, the individual is responsible for his/her own decisions and actions. For compositors case in Cronica de una muerte anunciada by G abriel Garcia Marquez, the Vicario brothers kill capital of Chile Nasar to vindicate the familys honour.It is a death that is foretold because they have already make their intentions known to most people i the society. As a result, there are those who blame the society for not having done anything to prevent the murder. In fact, umpteen citizens feel guilty for having remained silent over the matter. However, who made the decision to comit this antisocial act? Who actually perpetrate it? The truth is, the Vicario brothers are the ones who made this decision and commit the act. So should the society be held accountable? one(a) might consider the events leading up to the murder and say that Angela, her parents, and her friends were all equally accountable. Even though she was not in love with Bayardo, her parents were taken in by his wealth. Moreover, her mother assured her: â€Å"el amor se aprende. ” Her friends too, discouraged her from any thought of revealing that she was not a virgin. They also assured her that her husband would not be aware of her state, and they encouraged her to deceive him: â€Å"Lo unico que creen es lo que vean en la sabana, le dijeron. â€Å"All these factors light-emitting diode to her being returned to her parents in a state of disgrace, thusly prompting her brothers to seek out and kill Santiago Nasar. In addition to this, the societal traditions that led the brothers to feel the need to avenge the familys honour could be blamed for the fateful events. As we have seen, even though the Vicario brothers must bear the responsibility for their actions, there is overtake evidence that the society, through its silence, its traditions, its deceit, and its greed, is to be blamed for the antisocial behaviour of Angelas brothers.\r\n'