Analytical Evaluation of Freud Essay -- essays research papers

Based on the past education and the information I acquired during the duration of this course I chose to do my evaluation on Erik Erikson using the classical psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud and Carl Rogers using the non-Freudian / interpersonal approach from Adler and Jung. Since thither is no way to tell if either theory is redress or wrong it is imperative that we discover our avow theory among the popular ones and hail our own method of practice based on our current knowledge. This is through by comparing and evaluating each psychologist and their own theories to derive a parking lot ground among each of them.     In response to Erik Erikson and his approach on ego psychology he was an insecure child growing up who had problems with identity amazement. According to Freud and the classical psychoanalysis, this could possibly be a reflection of his Oedipus mingled in where he enkindle non find out with his father nor stern he get close to his mforme r(a). Since he is dealing with his own confusion of his own identity he can no longer look at flavours of closeness with either pargonnt causing him to feel tatterdemalion. His father abandoned him at an early age and so he never had that feeling of closeness with his father. Being as though he did not convey that male role during his growing up he can not feel that sense of love coming from either p atomic number 18nt which caused him to father up with the ego identity model in his own practices.      Freud didnt hardly invent the idea of the cognizant versus unconscious mind, but he for sure was responsible for making it popular. The conscious mind is what you are aware of at any particular second gear, your present perceptions, memories, thoughts, fantasies, feelings, what sport you. Working closely with the conscious mind is what Freud called the preconscious, what we might today call "available memory" anything that can easily be made consc ious, the memories you are not at the moment thinking about but can readily bring to mind. instanter no-one has a problem with these two layers of mind. But Freud suggested that these are the smallest split      Freud created a sense of super ego where you internalize the parental standards, ideas, and prohibitions. Since Erikson had no parents to identify with his sense of standards were nonexistent. He had a feeling of lower rank in rel... ...p  Obviously, everyone suffers from inferiority in one form or another. For example, Adler began his theoretical work considering organ inferiority, that is, the fact that each of us has weaker, as well as stronger, parts of our anatomy or physiology. many of us are born with means murmurs, or develop heart problems early in life near have weak lungs, or kidneys, or early liver problems Some of us stutter or lisp Some have diabetes, or asthma, or polio Some have weak eyes, or low hearing, or a poor muscula ture Some of us have innate tendencies to being heavy, others to being skinny Some of us are retarded, some of us are deformed Some of us are terribly tall or terribly short And so on and so on.      Both Erikson and Rogers possessed different qualities that can be attributed to other psychologists to evaluate themselves and their performance in the world of psychology. Each different theoretician created a different contribution to psychology and neither one is right or wrong. It is up to each individual person to create their own image of what is right or wrong and what they want to teach in their lives and use in their every day life.